Papers with conversational semantic parsing
Guided K-best Selection for Semantic Parsing Annotation (2022.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Anton Belyy, Chieh-yang Huang, Jacob Andreas, Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Sam Thomson, Richard Shin, Subhro Roy, Aleksandr Nisnevich, Charles Chen, Benjamin Van Durme
| Challenge: | a prototype model trained on a small amount of data is not available, leading to limited prediction performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a human-in-the-loop process that generates a set of valid candidates and allows users to quickly traverse the set and filter incorrect parses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed process can be used to efficiently traverse the candidate set and select the correct parse, with minimal modification when necessary. |
Online Semantic Parsing for Latency Reduction in Task-Oriented Dialogue (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Standard conversational semantic parsing maps a user's intent into an executable program, but execution is slow when expensive function calls are included. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of online semantic parsing to predict and execute function calls while the user is still speaking. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces latency with good parsing quality and execution cost. |
Value-Agnostic Conversational Semantic Parsing (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Subhro Roy, Yuchen Zhang, Alexander Kyte, Alan Guo, Sam Thomson, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Jason Wolfe, Jacob Andreas, Dan Klein
| Challenge: | Existing models rely on rich representations of dialogue history that include all previously generated components of the output. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that abstracts over values to focus prediction on type- and function-level context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models by 7.3% and 10.6% on SMCalFlow and TreeDST datasets. |
Conversational Semantic Parsing using Dynamic Context Graphs (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on conversational semantic parsing has focused on answering questions in isolation . whereas existing work on KBQA is focused on resolving questions in the context of natural language questions . |
| Approach: | They propose to model conversational semantic parsing over general purpose knowledge graphs with millions of entities and thousands of relation-types by exploiting its underlying structure and encoding it with a graph neural network. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is better at processing discourse information and longer interactions . it is better than static models at handling ellipsis and coreference, the authors show . |
MTSQL-R1: Towards Long-Horizon Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL via Agentic Training (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Taicheng Guo, Hai Wang, Chaochun Liu, Mohsen Golalikhani, Xin Chen, Xiangliang Zhang, Chandan K. Reddy
| Challenge: | Existing systems for multi-turn Text-to-SQL are limited to a short-horizon paradigm, generating a query per turn without execution, explicit verification, and refinement, which leads to non-executable or incoherent outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose to train an agentic training framework for long-horizon multi-turn Text-to-SQL that uses a Markov Decision Process to generate a query per turn without execution, explicit verification, and refinement. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on CoSQL and SParC show that MTSQL-R1 consistently outperforms strong baselines, highlighting the importance of environment-driven verification and memory-guided refinement for conversational semantic parsing. |